Skip to Main Content

Information Literacy: Scholarship as Conversation

Scholarship as Conversation - 
Synthesizes sources, incorporates  scholarly discussion

From the Framework

Knowledge Practices

Learners who are developing their information literate abilities

  • cite the contributing work of others in their own information production;
  • contribute to scholarly conversation at an appropriate level, such as local online community, guided discussion, undergraduate research journal, conference presentation/poster session;
  • identify barriers to entering scholarly conversation via various venues;
  • critically evaluate contributions made by others in participatory information environments;
  • identify the contribution that particular articles, books, and other scholarly pieces make to disciplinary knowledge;
  • summarize the changes in scholarly perspective over time on a particular topic within a specific discipline;
  • recognize that a given scholarly work may not represent the only or even the majority perspective on the issue.

Dispositions

Learners who are developing their information literate abilities

  • recognize they are often entering into an ongoing scholarly conversation and not a finished conversation;
  • seek out conversations taking place in their research area;
  • see themselves as contributors to scholarship rather than only consumers of it;
  • recognize that scholarly conversations take place in various venues;
  • suspend judgment on the value of a particular piece of scholarship until the larger context for the scholarly conversation is better understood;
  • understand the responsibility that comes with entering the conversation through participatory channels;
  • value user-generated content and evaluate contributions made by others;
  • recognize that systems privilege authorities and that not having a fluency in the language and process of a discipline disempowers their ability to participate and engage.

Mapped to the LEAP Standards

Capstone

4

Milestones

3                                                                  2

Benchmark

1

Understands that there is sustained discourse within a community of scholars, researchers, or professionals, with new insights and discoveries occurring over time as a result of competing perspectives and interpretations.

Understands that there is sustained discourse within a community of scholars. Begins to identify the new insights and discoveries that occur over time as a result of competing perspectives and interpretations.

Marginally understands that there is a sustained discourse within a community of scholars. Has trouble identifying new insights and discoveries that occur over time as a result of this discourse.

Does not understand that there is a sustained discourse within a community of scholars. Has trouble identifying new insights and discoveries that occur over time as a result of this discourse.

Assignment Ideas

  • Give students a two-part assignment: one having them trace the development of scholarship on a particular topic using the traditional “information cycle” model with the “invisible college” and print publication outlets; then have them expand/refine that model by tracing changes based on social media forums or online communities.
  • Assign an entire class to conduct an investigation of a particular topic from its treatment in the popular media, and then trace its origin in conversations among scholars and researchers.
  • Have students select a seminal work on a topic, and then identify sources that preceded and continued the conversation, analyzing the impact of the seminal work on the field.
  • Create a timeline to track the evolving threads of a continuing scholarly conversation.
  • Select a topic on which students have some knowledge or experience. Identify a venue (blog, discussion forum, other social media site) in which a scholarly conversation is taking place. Ask students to:
    • Identify key players and their perspectives.
    • Compare a related scholarly article by one of the players to the online conversation.
    • Consider how to involve themselves in the conversation.